Ivanka Trump Sued for Presumably Copying $785 Shoe Design

By Admin - 1 day ago12 Comments

Fashion business owner and shoe designer Ivanka Trump is being called out as a thief by high-end Italian shoes company Aquazzura. The shoes brand filed match versus Trump for supposedly taking at least three of its designs and using them in her own, eponymous shoe line, the Huffington Post reports. Likewise called in the match is Marc Fisher, the manufacturer Trump collaborates with, as well as 2 other companies. The match accuses the companies of repeated infringement and misleading trade practices.


One of the primary complaints in Aquazzura s fit, which was submitted Tuesday in a Manhattan federal court, belongs to the super-sexy Wild Thing shoe ($ 785), a fringy, high-heeled shoe that looks almost identical to Trump’s Hettie stiletto ($ 145), which offers through sellers like Bloomingdales, Lord and Taylor, and Nordstrom. Let’s compare the two designs below: fringe covered in the front, reddish orange, and an ankle-wrapped tie with tassels. We believe they look quite similar, however Aquazzura will need to let a judge choose.


Before he filed the fit, the founding designer of Aquazzura, Edgardo Osorio, called out Trump’s supposed thievery throughout Paris Fashion Week on Instagram, composing, one of the most disturbing things in the fashion industry is when someone blatantly steals your copyright designs and doesn’t care. You ought to understand much better.


Osorio told Footwear News he has absolutely nothing against Ivanka Trump personally, but rather with the copycat culture of the women s shoes industry. I prepare to do the very same with Steve Madden and other individuals who have ripped us off, he informed the publication. Even some of my direct competitors are copying me Sometimes I look at the buys in department stores, and I see copies of my shoes.

Other designs Trump s company has been accused of stealing consist of Aquazzura’s Forever Marilyn and Belgravia shoes.


Marc Fisher’s CFO, Matthew Burris, informed Yahoo Style, this is a baseless suit targeted at creating promotion. The shoe in concern is representative of a trending fashion style, is exempt to intellectual property law protection, and there are comparable designs made by a number of major brand names. The claim lacks merit, and we will vigorously safeguard ourselves against the claim.